John Isner vs Daniel Evans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L W L L W L
Form
W L W L L L W W L LHead-To-Head: Isner 1 - 2 Evans
They have played 7 sets in total, with Isner winning 3 and Evans winning 4. The last match between Isner and Evans was at the ATP Cup - Sydney, 06-01-2022, Robin, Hard with Daniel Evans getting the victory 6-4 7-6(3).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| John Isner | 1 |
| Daniel Evans | 2 |
ATP Cup - Sydney(06-01-2022)
6
4
7
6
| Isner | Stats | Evans |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (5-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 660 | Ranking | 197 |
| 8 | Highest Rank | 21 |
| 39 | Age | 34 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 20 | Titles | 24 |
| 61% (561-352) | Career Total W/L | 59% (572-396) |
| $15,094,425 | Career Prize Money | $4,992,575 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 2 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Maneiro VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Daniel Evans
Player
John Isner
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
4
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
86%
(
19 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
7 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| 7-6(3) 7-5 |
Stats
John Isner
Player
Daniel Evans
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
21
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
17 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| 3-6 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
John Isner
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
4
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
0
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
18%
(
11 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 35 | Games Won | 39 |
| 53 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:39:26 | Average Match Time | 1:39:26 |
| 68% (142/208) | 1st Serve % | 66% (125/189) |
| 78% (111/142) | 1st Serve Win % | 82% (102/125) |
| 55% (36/66) | 2nd Serve Win % | 73% (47/64) |
| 100% (2/2) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (4/14) |
| 21% (40/189) | Return Points Win % | 29% (61/208) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
John Isner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
John Isner
72%
(
115 of
160)
1st Serve %
69%
(
111 of
162)
19
Aces
48
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
91 of
115)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
96 of
111)
62%
(
28 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
26%
(
41 of
160)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
40 of
162)
159
Total Points Won
163
|
3-6 4-6 7-6(3) 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Isner
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
75 of
113)
11
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
52 of
75)
83%
(
25 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
16 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
113)
112
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
John Isner
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
5
Aces
20
3
Double Faults
5
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
17 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
John Isner
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
8
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Isner
Player
Rinky Hijikata
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
19
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Koepfer
Player
John Isner
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
4
Aces
21
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
53 of
63)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
54 of
71)
67%
(
24 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
22%
(
22 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
23 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
John Isner
79%
(
55 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
5
Aces
20
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
17 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
John Isner
Player
Tommy Paul
64%
(
73 of
114)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
20
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
7
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
49 of
63)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
41 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
107
Total Points Won
106
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Isner
Player
Corentin Moutet
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Isner
Player
Alex Bolt
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
20
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
34 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Evans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Coria
Player
Daniel Evans
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Daniel Evans
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jacopo Berrettini
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jelle Sels
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Daniel Evans
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
99)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Daniel Evans
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Rincon
Player
Daniel Evans
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(7) 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Stuart Parker
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Daniel Evans
69%
(
83 of
120)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
48 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
105)
116
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Benoit Paire
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
48%
(
45 of
93)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
9
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
35 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (561/352) | Win/Loss | 59% (572/396) |
| 58% (1422/1013) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (1358/1025) |
| 52% (13780/12956) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (12006/10948) |
| 65% (340/186) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (248/157) |
| 55% (87/70) | Clay Win/Loss | 46% (50/59) |
| 54% (78/67) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (181/113) |
| 66% (56/29) | Grass Win/Loss | 58% (93/67) |
| 1.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 14970 | Aces Total | 2705 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1857 | Total Double Faults | 1917 |
| 1:25:12 | Average Match Time | 1:7:5 |
| 469.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 482.01 |
| 69% (48323/70140) | 1st Serve % | 61% (29251/47891) |
| 79% (38033/48323) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (20758/29251) |
| 56% (12267/21947) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (9469/18639) |
| 30% (1160/3810) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1802/4411) |
| 30% (20799/70185) | Return Points Win % | 38% (18340/48014) |
| 60% (87/58) | Slam W/L | 52% (46/42) |
| 60% (147/96) | Masters W/L | 42% (33/46) |
| 44% (26/33) | Cups W/L | 43% (20/26) |
| 64% (242/137) | Main Tour W/L | 52% (105/98) |
| 0% (0/3) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 70% (44/19) | Challenger W/L | 62% (162/99) |
| 71% (12/5) | Futures W/L | 71% (205/84) |
| 62% (464/747) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (529/874) |
| 59% (97/164) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 46% (39/84) |
| 60% (558/933) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (188/353) |
| 57% (204/357) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (177/330) |
| 84% (541/456) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (566/478) |
| 16% (541/85) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (566/85) |
| 29% (371/106) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (401/95) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
